Why we must separate the art from the
artist.
by : muhamad iqbal
There will be less books,
artworks, and musicians for us to enjoy and learn from if we don't keep art and
artists apart in this day and age.
It's important for
enjoying art. People are prone to errors, and such mistakes are typically
unacceptable. Nonetheless, their art does not condone their faults. People
should be able to appreciate music, movies and art even if an artist has done
wrong, as long as they think about it critically.
Art cannot exist as
merely a trendy pop obsession. It remains even helping one to recollect
cultures and civilizations that existed long ago. If only we get to know the
deeper implications of the histories of art that are appropriated and do
something towards the educational institutions about this, it is possible to
sustain such appropriated periods of art for a reasonable period of time and
allow it to evolve rather than be frozen. This is not to say that every artwork
that has ever been achieved should be appreciated and practiced in schools at
all times. It also implies that we have to look at the whole work rather than
dismiss it simply because we have attempted to impose the creators’ ideas over
the work.
One of the biggest
examples of separating art from the artist is in music and visual arts. Kanye
West and Pablo Picasso are both renowned for their contributions to their
respective fields, yet they have also been widely criticized for controversial
behavior and beliefs. Kanye West, for instance, has made statements and taken
actions that many find problematic, while Picasso’s documented history of
misogynistic behavior has cast a shadow over his personal character. However,
Kanye’s innovative approach to music production and Picasso’s revolutionary
contributions to modern art remain significant and influential.
When talking about the
relationship between artists and their art, it's crucial to keep in mind that
societal norms are constantly evolving. For instance, consider the film The
Shining (1980), directed by Stanley Kubrick. This psychological horror is
celebrated for its groundbreaking visuals and eerie storytelling, yet Kubrick's
intense treatment of actor Shelley Duvall during filming has been widely
criticized. Despite the controversy surrounding Kubrick’s methods, The
Shining remains an iconic piece of cinema with a lasting impact on horror
and psychological thriller genres. If the film had been dismissed due to
Kubrick’s behavior, its influence on visual storytelling and character-driven
horror would have been lost to future audiences.
The most common instance
of dseperating art from the artist can be seen in the realm of music. like
Elvis Presley or Robert Plant, Courtney Love and Matty Healy pose similar
issues Musicians who are inherently flawed individuals. However, it is
important to distinguish musicians from their music, their music frequently
impacts their genre and should not be disregarded.
In 1992, Nirvana's lead singer Kurt Cobain admitted to Rolling Stone that while
he appreciated Aerosmith and Led Zeppelin's music, it wasn't until later that
he recognized the sexism in their lyrics. Choosing to appreciate art regardless
of the creator is not a way to justify the music one enjoys. It requires
recognizing a artist’s imperfections and being judgemental of those we admire.
“Although I listened to
Aerosmith and Led Zeppelin, and I really did enjoy some of the melodies they’d
written, it took me so many years to realize that a lot of it had to do with
sexism.”
Another artist who has
recently drawn attention, though not always for the most positive reasons, is
Liam Payne, former member of One Direction. Payne has faced criticism for
comments that some have interpreted as homophobic or insensitive, prompting a reevaluation
among fans and the public alike. While these remarks have cast a shadow on his
individual reputation, One Direction's music remains widely celebrated for its
significant impact on pop culture.
Moving forward, it’s
essential that we separate art from the artists who created it. Art carries
historical significance and cultural weight, and instead of letting it fade
into obscurity, we should strive to learn from it. ocietal standards are
constantly evolving. What was considered “obscene” seventy years ago could very
well be viewed as essential or important today. So rather than dismissing the
art because of the artist’s shortcomings, we should appreciate the contributions
that can still resonate in our changing cultural landscape.
No comments:
Post a Comment